Rubber Tensile Testing to ASTM D412 and ISO 37: Where the Scatter Comes From

Rubber tensile results scatter more than most laboratory numbers, and the instinct is to blame the material. Sometimes that is fair: a compound that was mixed or cured unevenly will show it. More often the spread was built in before the crosshead moved, by the way the specimen was cut, measured and conditioned, and the test itself only reported it.

ASTM D412 and ISO 37 both measure the same family of properties: tensile strength, elongation at break and the stress at a given elongation. Both are explicit about what has to be held constant for those numbers to mean anything, and most of the scatter that reaches a report traces back to one of those conditions slipping.

The Specimen Is Cut, Not Machined

The first choice is the shape. ASTM D412 has two test methods, Method A for dumbbell and straight section specimens and Method B for cut rings, and it notes directly that the two methods do not produce identical results. ISO 37 provides seven test pieces, dumbbell types 1, 2, 3, 4 and 1A and ring types A and B, and says that results for different materials should not be regarded as comparable unless the same type of test piece was used. Rings in particular give lower tensile strength than dumbbells, sometimes much lower, because stress across a stretched ring is not uniform. The shape belongs in the report next to the number for exactly this reason.

NG-T Press M Series manual cutting press for punching rubber tensile dumbbells from sheet
NG-T Press M Series. One stroke, one dumbbell, with the knife set by the standard.

Within a shape, the die sets the geometry. The ASTM Die C dumbbell has a narrow section 6 mm wide and 33 mm long with bench marks 25 mm apart, and the ISO type 1 dumbbell is close but not the same, with a narrow portion 6.2 mm wide over the same 33 mm and a 25 mm test length on a standard thickness of 2.0 mm. Because a rubber specimen is punched rather than machined, the condition of the cutting edge becomes the condition of the specimen. ISO 37 limits how far the narrow portion of the die may depart from parallel to 0.05 mm, and a ragged edge or an uneven width moves the break before the test begins.

Direction matters as well. Calendered and milled sheet has a grain, and dumbbells cut along it can give different values from dumbbells cut across it. ISO 37 asks for dumbbells to be cut parallel to the grain wherever possible, with a second set cut at right angles when the grain effect is the thing being studied, and it asks for the grain direction to appear in the report.

Where the dumbbell breaks
Type 1 and Type 1A, Drawn to Scale
DRAWN TO SCALE FROM THE ISO 37 DIMENSIONS, TRANSITIONS SCHEMATICtest length 25 mmType 1overall 115 mm, ends 25 mm widenarrow portion 33 x 6.2 mmabout 60 %broke outside the test lengthtest length 20 mmType 1Aoverall 100 mm, ends 25 mm widenarrow portion 21 x 5 mmabout 13 %broke outside the test length
Both dumbbells come from the ISO 37 dimension table and are drawn at the same scale; the transitions are schematic. In the interlaboratory data published with ISO 37, type 1 pieces with a 25 mm test length broke outside it in about 60 % of cases and type 1A pieces in about 13 %. A piece that breaks outside the narrow portion is discarded and repeated, so a shape that breaks there less often also wastes fewer specimens.
Scroll the diagram sideways to see all of it.

The shoulder of the dumbbell is the weak point of the whole arrangement. A break that starts where the narrow portion widens into the end tab says more about the stress concentration at that radius than about the rubber, which is why ISO 37 sizes the die so that only the end tabs sit in the grips, and why it discards any test piece that breaks outside the narrow portion and repeats it on a fresh one. The interlaboratory data published with ISO 37 shows how large the effect is. Type 1 pieces with a 25 mm test length broke outside it in about 60 % of cases, against about 13 % for type 1A, whose shape spreads the strain more evenly along the narrow portion.


Thickness Is the Denominator

Every stress in a rubber tensile report is a force divided by the original cross section, and on a 2 mm specimen the thickness is the smaller and less certain of the two dimensions. The width comes from the die: ISO 37 takes it as the distance between the cutting edges in the narrow part. The thickness has to be measured on each piece, and that measurement carries straight into the result.

The denominator of every stress
Three Readings, One Median
NARROW PORTION, SIDE VIEW, THICKNESS EXAGGERATEDt1end of test lengtht2centret3end of test lengthArea uses the median of t1, t2, t3; no reading more than 2 % from it.WHY THE GAUGE MATTERSstress = force / (width x thickness)width comes from the die edges0.1 mm on a 2.0 mm specimenmoves every stress by about 5 %in the opposite directionA gauge that presses too hard reads thin, and stresses come out high.
ISO 37 reads thickness at the centre and at each end of the test length and uses the median for the cross section, rejecting a piece when any reading sits more than 2 % from it. The width is taken from the die. Because thickness sits in the denominator, a reading 0.1 mm too thin on a 2.0 mm specimen raises every calculated stress by about 5 %.
Scroll the diagram sideways to see all of it.

ISO 37 measures thickness at three places, at the centre and at each end of the test length, and uses the median of the three for the area. None of the three readings may differ from that median by more than 2 %, which rejects a piece that is visibly tapered before it is ever pulled. When two groups of specimens are compared, the median thickness of each group has to sit within 7.5 % of the grand median, so a comparison between compounds is not quietly a comparison between sheet thicknesses. The gauge itself is the one specified in method A of ISO 23529. Rubber is soft, so a gauge that presses harder than intended reads thin, and every stress calculated from that reading comes out high.


Rings, Set and the Other Numbers in the Report

Dumbbells are not the only shape the standards allow, and the ring deserves a word because it behaves differently. ISO 37 describes a normal ring, type A, with an internal diameter of 44.6 mm and an axial thickness and radial width of 4 mm, and a miniature ring, type B, with an internal diameter of 8 mm and a section of 1 mm, used only where there is not enough material for type A. Rings suit automated testing, and they average out the grain because the ring runs both along and across it. Their weakness is that the stress across a stretched ring is not uniform, which is why ISO 37 prefers dumbbells for tensile strength and notes that rings give lower values. Elongation at break comes out about the same, provided the ring elongation is calculated on the initial internal circumference and the dumbbells are cut at right angles to the grain where the grain is significant.

A rubber tensile report usually carries several numbers from the same curve, and they do not all mean what their names suggest. Tensile strength and elongation at break come from the point of rupture. The stress at a given elongation, typically 100 percent or 300 percent, is read from the curve on the way there, and it is the value most people call a modulus even though it is a stress and not a slope. ISO 37 adds the elongation at a given stress, and a stress and elongation at yield for the thermoplastic rubbers and compounds that show one.

Reading one curve
Where the Numbers in a Rubber Report Come From
0100200300400500600elongation, %stressstress at 100 percentstress at 300 percentbreak: tensile strengthand elongation at breakfirst pullpulled againSCHEMATIC CURVE: SHAPE ONLY, NO STRESS VALUES
The shape is schematic and carries no stress values. The stress at 100 and 300 percent elongation is read on the way up and is a stress, not a slope. Tensile strength and elongation at break come from the point of rupture. The dashed curve shows why strength values are taken on a first pull: rubber that has been stretched once responds more softly the next time.
Scroll the diagram sideways to see all of it.

Tensile set is the odd one out, because it is measured after the pull rather than during it. A specimen is stretched, held, released and allowed to recover, and the deformation left over is the set. ASTM D412 points out that this residual deformation is partly permanent and partly recoverable, so the extension period and the recovery period have to be controlled; measured a few minutes earlier or later, the same specimen reports a different set. The same history effect explains why the strength values are taken on a first pull. Rubber that has already been stretched once responds more softly the next time, so a specimen that was pre stretched while being set up, or pulled once to check the grips, no longer gives a first pull result.


Speed, Temperature and the History of the Rubber

Elastomers respond to how fast and how warm they are stretched, so both standards fix the rate and the temperature rather than leave them to the operator. ASTM D412 runs Method A at a grip separation rate of 500 ± 50 mm per minute. ISO 37 uses a nominal 500 mm per minute for types 1, 1A and 2 and 200 mm per minute for the smaller types 3 and 4. A constant crosshead speed is not a constant strain rate in the narrow section once the specimen has stretched several times its length, which is one more reason results are only compared when the speed and the test piece match. ASTM D412 states the general rule plainly: extension rate, temperature, humidity, specimen geometry and pretest conditioning all affect the result, so materials are compared only when tested under the same conditions.

The rubber also carries a history that the test cannot see. ISO 37 sets a minimum of 16 hours between vulcanization and testing, a maximum of four weeks for tests that are not on products, and asks that evaluations meant to be compared are made after the same interval. Samples are conditioned for at least 3 hours before the dumbbells are cut, and the series meant to be compared is tested at one standard laboratory temperature. Properties such as tensile strength and the stress at a given elongation are measured on a first pull, on specimens that have not been stretched before, because rubber that has been loaded once responds differently the second time.

An ISO 37 dumbbell test, in order
Five Points Where the Spread Gets In
None of these steps produces an obvious failure when it is skipped. Each one adds a little variation that later reads as the material.
1
Rest the rubber
At least 16 hours after vulcanization, with the same interval for every set that will be compared.
Before cutting
2
Cut with the grain
One clean stroke with a sharp, parallel die, along the grain wherever possible, and the direction recorded.
Same die per series
3
Measure three times
Thickness at the centre and both ends of the test length, the median used, no reading more than 2 % from it.
Median, not mean
4
Pull at the set rate
500 mm per minute for types 1, 1A and 2, with the ends gripped symmetrically so tension spreads evenly across the section.
First pull
5
Keep or repeat
A piece that breaks outside the narrow portion is discarded and replaced. Report the median of at least three, five where uncertainty matters.
Median of the set
The median is chosen on purpose. One poorly cut piece moves a mean, but it does not move a median of five, so the reporting rule already assumes the occasional bad specimen.

Testing Again After Heat Ageing

Many rubber specifications do not stop at one tensile result. They ask how much the result changes after the compound has been held at an elevated temperature, because rubber in service has to resist the slow loss of properties that oxidation and heat cause. ASTM D573 covers this with an air oven: it determines the influence of elevated temperature on the physical properties of vulcanized rubber, with the change in tensile strength and elongation as the usual measure. ISO 188 is the international counterpart for accelerated ageing of vulcanized and thermoplastic rubber.

NG-AGOV-ADV high temperature aging oven for heat ageing rubber specimens before tensile testing
NG-AGOV-ADV. Air oven ageing to 300 °C before the second pull.

An ageing result is a difference between two tensile tests, an unaged set and an aged set, and a difference doubles every source of scatter described above. If the two sets were cut from different sheets, with different dies or in different directions, the change in properties includes the change in preparation. The practical rule follows from that: cut both sets from the same sheet, with the same die and in the same direction, measure them the same way, and pull them at the same speed and temperature, so that the oven is the only thing that differs between them. D573 itself is careful about what the result means. It states that the results may not correlate exactly with service performance, since service conditions vary widely, and that the method can be used to evaluate rubber compounds on a laboratory comparison basis.

The oven then has to hold its side of the comparison. Our NG-AGOV-ADV ageing oven reaches 300 °C, controls to ±0.1 °C with uniformity of ±2 °C at 100 °C, exchanges the air 3 to 10 times per hour, and is built to support the static air method of ISO 188, with adjustable trays and programmable cycles for heating steps and duration.


Grips, Strain and the Number You Report

A rubber dumbbell can stretch to several times its original length, and the grips have to hold it through all of that without crushing the end tabs at the start or letting them slide out at the end. A fixed, pre tightened clamp tends to do one or the other. Self tightening grips solve it by letting the clamping pressure rise with the tensile force, so the grip follows the specimen as it thins. The self tightening grips we supply for plastics and rubber are rated to 2 kN and 5 kN, and on that page the limits that decide the choice are specimen thickness and width as much as force.

GenTest testing software home screen on a NextGen universal testing machine with test, method, analysis and system menus
GenTest. Methods are set once, then every pull follows them.

Strain needs the same care. Elongation is read between marks on the narrow portion rather than from crosshead travel, because the end tabs and the shoulders stretch too. ISO 37 describes two reference marks placed on the unstrained narrow part, equidistant from the centre and at right angles to its axis, for use with a non contact extensometer, which follows a large extension without adding force or mass to a soft specimen. The stress at a given elongation that rubber datasheets often call a modulus is reported as a stress at that elongation, not as a slope.

The frame has to allow for all of this. The NG-EML Series A lists elastomers and rubber compounds to ASTM D412 and ISO 37 among its typical specimens, runs crosshead speeds up to 2400 mm per minute and offers 960 mm of vertical crosshead travel, and its force range from 50 N to 5 kN suits the loads a rubber dumbbell actually reaches. GenTest software comes pre-installed with ASTM, ISO, EN, DIN and BS method templates, so the speed, the gauge length and the reporting rule for a D412 or ISO 37 test are set once in the method rather than typed in for each run. Our article on UTM grips and fixtures covers the wider choice of jaws, and the universal testing machines for rubber testing page lists the frames for heavier work.

From sheet to stress strain curve
The Cut and the Pull
Most of the scatter in a rubber tensile programme is decided at these two stations: how the dumbbell leaves the sheet, and how the frame holds and measures it on the way to the break.
NG-T Press M Series manual cutting press for rubber tensile specimens
Specimen preparation
NG-T Press M Series Cutting Press
A compact manual press for punching rubber, tape and special materials, with an optional cutting knife to ASTM D412 and additional D412 knives for dies B, C, D, E and F on request.
Rubber dumbbells and other test shapes30 kN punching force, 25 mm stroke, 84 mm punching head
View product
NG-EML Series A single column universal testing machine for rubber tensile testing
Tensile frame
NG-EML Series A Universal Testing Machine
A single column frame for tension, compression and flexure that lists elastomers and rubber compounds to ASTM D412 and ISO 37 among its typical specimens.
50 N to 5 kN, crosshead speed to 2400 mm/min960 mm vertical crosshead travel
View product

The report closes the loop. ISO 37 asks for the type of test piece, the preparation method, the median thickness, the grain direction, the number of pieces tested, the individual results and the medians, and the date. Read that way, a rubber tensile report is less a list of strengths than a record of how the specimens were made, and two reports can only be compared when those records match. Our earlier look at the NG-T Press M Series covers the press itself, and the rubber specimen preparation range shows what is available for the cut.

Talk to us about rubber tensile testing
Tell Us Your Compound, Your Die and Your Standard
Which standard your customers ask for, ASTM D412 or ISO 37, which dumbbell or ring you cut, the sheet thickness you work with, how far your compounds stretch before they break, and how many specimens a shift tests. That is enough for us to confirm the cutting knife, the grips and the frame, and how the test can run with the least operator influence.
More on this topic

Keep Reading in Rubber Specimen Preparation

See the Rubber Specimen Preparation range
Rubber Testing19 Aug 2026Abrasion Testing Methods and What Each One Actually MeasuresA buyer asks for a material with good abrasion resistance and expects a single number back. There isn't one. Wear depends on what rubs against what, under what load, in what motion, and every abrasion method freezes a different combination of those into a test. A compound that wins on one machine can lose on another, and both results are correct. This guide walks through the methods a materials laboratory actually meets, what each one measures, what it reports, and where the number stops being comparable to anyone else's. Abrasion Resistance Is a Method Result, Not a Property Four things separate one abrasion test from another, and all four change the answer. The abradant comes first. Coated abrasive cuts, a wire screen tears, a wool fabric...Read the articleRubber Testing6 Aug 2025Most Popular DIN Standards in Material TestingStandards keep material tests readable across labs and borders. Among the major families you’ll run into in day-to-day work, DIN standards from the German Institute for Standardization (Deutsches Institut für Normung) are especially visible. Many have been harmonized with European and international practices, so data produced according to DIN often translates cleanly across markets. In this article, we break down 13 commonly used DIN standards in material testing. For each one, we explain what the method measures, typical specimens and conditions, the kind of equipment it’s run on, and where it’s most often applied. Where applicable, we’ll point to close ISO or ASTM counterparts and highlight practical differences that can impact results, such as...Read the articleRubber Testing23 Oct 20244-position ICI / Mace Snag Tester for Fabrics OverviewDid you know that fabric snagging is one of the most common causes of product returns in the fashion and upholstery industries? In fact, studies show that up to 15% of consumer complaints in these industries are due to the premature wear and tear of fabrics, often caused by snagging. For manufacturers and quality control professionals, preventing fabric damage during normal wear is a top priority. This is where tools like ICI / Mace Snag Testers for fabric and textiles come into play. Whether you're working in textiles or focused on fabric quality, this guide will show you how the 4-position ICI / Mace Snag Tester can help you make more informed decisions and achieve more durable products. What is the ICI Mace Snag Tester? An ICI Mace Snag Tester is...Read the articleRubber Testing17 Oct 2024NG-T Press M-Series Cutting Press System: A Must for Rubber Manufacturers & Test LabsRubber testing is fundamental to verifying the performance and safety of materials used in industries like automotive, aerospace, and manufacturing. In fact, poor testing methods can lead to failures in up to 70% of rubber products used in critical applications. Proper specimen preparation is a key step in reliable testing. The purpose of this blog is to introduce the NG-T Press M Series - Manual Cutting Press System for Rubber Tensile Specimens. This system is designed to meet the highest requirements of high-precision rubber testing. NG-T Press M Series – Manual Cutting Press System The NG-T Press M Series is a manual cutting press system created specifically to prepare high-precision rubber tensile specimens for testing. This system is engineered...Read the articleRubber Testing24 Sep 20248 Most Used ISO Standards in Material TestingWhat are ISO Standards? The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is an independent, non-governmental entity that develops and publishes standards to guarantee that products, services, and systems are safe, reliable, and of high quality. Established in 1947, ISO has grown to encompass over 25,000 standards that span a wide range of industries, including technology, manufacturing, material testing and environmental management. ISO standards facilitate international trade by creating a unified set of guidelines businesses can follow to meet global expectations. ISO's Purpose and Reach ISO standards serve as a vital tool for maintaining consistency, safety, and efficiency in a variety of fields. ISO standards provide a framework for...Read the articleRubber Testing13 Sep 2024The Importance of Rubber Material Testing in Product DurabilityDid you know that the average rubber tire travels over 75,000 miles before wearing out? This incredible longevity is not by accident. It is the result of rigorous testing that confirms rubber materials can withstand everyday use. Whether in the automotive, aerospace, or industrial sectors, rubber products are constantly pushed to their limits. Without proper testing, such material would fail prematurely, posing significant safety risks and financial losses. Rubber material testing is highly relevant to preventing such failures by evaluating a product's durability, performance, and compliance with safety standards. Through a series of precise tests, manufacturers can identify weaknesses, improve formulations, and ultimately deliver high-quality...Read the articleRubber Testing9 Sep 2024NextGen’s Moving Die Rheometer (MDR): The Future of Rubber TestingThe Moving Die Rheometer (MDR) is a tool in rubber testing used to evaluate rubber compounds' curing characteristics in both quality control and research. It measures how rubber responds to vulcanization by applying oscillating strain and recording the resulting torque. Equipped with a sealed, biconical die system, the Moving Die Rheometer meets all major industry standards such as ASTM D5289, ISO 6502, and DIN 53529. Due to this, MDR plays an important role in providing accurate and consistent measurements of rubber's mechanical properties, such as stiffness and viscosity, which are necessary for maintaining the quality of rubber products. Material testing labs often struggle to find reliable testing equipment suited to their specific needs....Read the articleRubber Testing27 Aug 2024Why NextGen is Your Best Choice for Material Testing EquipmentIn the field of material testing, finding a reliable partner that provides advanced equipment, consumables, and comprehensive services such as calibration, maintenance, and technical support is extremely important. With a large number of companies specializing in material testing equipment, the challenge lies in determining which one truly offers the best solutions. Often, the answer to this question becomes clear only after experiencing their products and services firsthand. NextGen Material Testing, stands out as a leading company in this competitive industry. We supply our clients with cutting-edge equipment designed for a broad range of testing applications. We make sure that our customers have all the necessary consumables and support to keep...Read the articleRubber Testing30 Jun 2024An Overview of the NextGen’s Linear Abrasion TesterThere are many types of abrasion testing in material science: Martindale abrasion test, Wyzenbeek abrasion test, DIN abrasion test, and pin-on-disk wear testing. Among the most commonly used methods is the abrasion test, which involves rotating a specimen against an abrasive wheel under a specific load to measure the material's wear resistance. This test is commonly used on coatings, plastics, and textiles to assess their durability and longevity. As part of these tests, abrasion testers are used. In this blog, let us introduce you to our notable product in the field of material testing - the Linear Abrasion Tester, a machine designed to meet the high standards and requirements of abrasion testing. General Information About Linear Abrasion Tester...Read the article
Related equipment

Machines Behind This Article

NG-T-Press M Series – Manual Cutting Press for Rubber SpecimensRubber Specimen PreparationNG-T-Press M Series – Manual Cutting Press for Rubber SpecimensNG-T-Press M Series is a compact manual cutting press for preparing rubber, tape, and specialty material specimens for tensile and mechanical testing. With optional...View productNG-EML Series A – Single-Column Universal Testing Machine (50 N – 5 kN)Electromechanical Universal Testing Machines for Rubber TestingNG-EML Series A – Single-Column Universal Testing Machine (50 N – 5 kN)NG-EML Series A is a compact single-column benchtop universal testing machine for low-force tensile, compression, and flexural testing. Covering 50 N to 5 kN...View productNG-EML Series B – Dual-Column Universal Testing Machine (100 N – 10 kN)Electromechanical Universal Testing Machines for Rubber TestingNG-EML Series B – Dual-Column Universal Testing Machine (100 N – 10 kN)NG-EML Series B is a dual-column benchtop electromechanical universal testing machine for precision testing from 100 N to 10 kN. Built for research and industrial...View productNG-AGOV-ADV – High-Temperature Aging OvenRubber TestingNG-AGOV-ADV – High-Temperature Aging OvenNG-AGOV-ADV is a high-temperature aging oven for testing how rubber, plastics, elastomers, insulating materials, and similar products respond to long-term heat...View productSelf-Tightening Grips for Elastic MaterialsGrips and Fixtures for NextGen Universal Testing Machines (UTMs)Self-Tightening Grips for Elastic MaterialsSelf-tightening grips are designed for tensile testing of deformable, elastic, or low-friction materials such as rubber, plastics, foams, textiles, and biomedical...View productSide-Action Tensile GripsGrips and Fixtures for NextGen Universal Testing Machines (UTMs)Side-Action Tensile GripsSide action tensile grips provide quick, secure clamping for films, thin sheets, textiles, fine wires, polymer strips, and other flexible specimens on universal...View productPneumatic Grips for Fast and Repeatable ClampingGrips and Fixtures for NextGen Universal Testing Machines (UTMs)Pneumatic Grips for Fast and Repeatable ClampingPneumatic grips provide fast, repeatable air-actuated clamping for universal testing machines in high-throughput tensile and compression workflows. Designed for...View product