Precision Low Speed Diamond and Abrasive Cutters for the Next Generation

If you’re looking for equipment that allows you to focus on precise, abrasive cutting of materials (including both soft and hard metals) look no further than our GenCut series. Housed within our precision metallography equipment category, this product grouping allows our clients to shape specimens into the exact size required for further analysis.

To learn more about the models of low-speed precision saws provided by industry leader NextGen, read summaries of each below.

GenCut GL 100 Series:
This series precision cutter includes our low speed diamond saw machines, which allow easy sectioning of delicate parts or materials with no deformation. This machine uses a thin diamond blade with continual lubrication and will not allow any burning to occur. This model allows for wheels with a 3″-5″ diameter and provides speed wheel control from 0-400 RPM.

GenCut GL 200 Series:
Similar to the GenCut GL 100 Series, this machine uses a precision low speed diamond saw and again, allows you to cut and section wide variety of small and delicate samples. This model is notable for its ability to handle non-homogenous material structures.

GenCut GL 600-800 Series:
This series low speed precision saw, which includes the 600, 700 and 800 models, is both compact and powerful. Conveniently designed as a table-top manual abrasive cutter, these models fit into any metallographic or materials oriented lab, making this machine particularly versatile. All three models of low speed diamond saws also provide a robust 1-3HP motor and are designed for heavy-duty continual use.

GenCut GL 1000 Series:
Like the GenCut GL 600-800 Series, the GenCut GL 1000 abrasive metallographic cut off machine series uses a laboratory design and will section any material with no deformation. This model also takes performance up a notch from the 100 and 200 series by using a high-speed (rather than low-speed) precision cutter and it also uses both diamond and abrasive blades. An added feature is that this model allows users to cut on X & Z axis to a perfect cut during every use.

GenCut GL 2000 Series:
Performance meets advanced technology with this metallographic cutter model. An automatic cutter is complemented with a touch screen panel and provides simple positioning of samples for cutting and sectioning. It also goes one step further than the GenCut GL 1000 Series by allowing cuts in 2 directions, providing a large cutting capacity and programmable functions. This model also uses either an abrasive cut off blade or a diamond blade on variable rotational speed.

GenCut GL QA Series:
This model provides user control through the use of manual units. We recommend this model for specific section cutting from printed circuit boards, large flat materials or electronic components. Like the excited for section cutting from printed circuit boards, flat materials or electronic components. Like the GenCut GL 100 Series and the GenCut GL 200 Series, this model uses a diamond blade.

Whatever model of cutter you choose, you can be sure that our experts at NextGen Material Testing will be happy to help. Request quote today to get started with your specific metallography cut-off saw!

More on this topic

Keep Reading in Abrasive Metallographic Cutting

See the Abrasive Metallographic Cutting range
Metal Testing28 Sep 2026The Rockwell Scale Explained: How to Choose Between HRC, HRB and Superficial ScalesA Rockwell hardness number tells you very little until you know the letters that come with it. A reading of 60 on one scale and a reading of 60 on another describe different materials, tested with a different indenter under a different force, and neither can be compared with the other until someone knows which scale produced it. A drawing that asks for 60 HRC is specifying a whole test: a diamond indenter, a total force of 150 kgf and a depth measurement made in a defined way. ASTM defines thirty Rockwell scales. Picking the right one is a decision that can go wrong without any warning, because the wrong scale does not produce an error message. It produces a number, and that number looks just as plausible as a valid one. This article explains what...Read the articleMetal Testing18 Sep 2026Gauge Length Marking and What It Does to Your Elongation ResultRecorded during the pull. Elongation is the one tensile property that is not measured during the test. Force and extension are captured while the machine is pulling, but elongation after fracture is worked out afterwards, on a bench, from two pieces of broken metal and a pair of marks that somebody applied before the test started. Everything that was careless about those marks arrives, unchanged, in the final report. That makes gauge marking a measurement step rather than a preparation chore. It is also the step most likely to be done differently by two operators in the same laboratory, on the same shift, using the same standard. The Marks Are Part of the Measurement Chain Measured after the break. A torn end against the rule. After the specimen...Read the articleMetal Testing10 Sep 2026How to Measure Case Depth: Effective Depth, Total Depth and the Hardness Limit That Decides ItA drawing asks for case depth in a single number, and that number carries a tolerance, an acceptance decision and sometimes a rejected heat lot. What the drawing rarely says is which of two different depths it means, or which hardness value marks the boundary. Two laboratories can follow the same procedure on the same part, measure carefully, and report depths that differ by a noticeable margin, because they drew the line in different places. The measurement itself is not the hard part. Agreeing on what is being measured is. This article is about the traverse: how case depth is defined, what fixes the boundary, and what the work demands from the equipment that produces it. If you are still deciding whether microhardness is the right method at all,...Read the articleMetal Testing5 Aug 2026Vicat Testing and What Cement Setting Time Really Tells YouVicat setting time is a standardized cement paste measurement used for specification compliance and quality control. It identifies when a paste prepared under defined conditions reaches the initial and final set criteria of the selected method. It does not directly predict concrete haul time, cold joint formation, finishing time or field workability, because those depend on the complete mixture: water content, admixtures, aggregates and temperature. This guide covers what Vicat setting time measures, how the apparatus produces the number, which test conditions make results drift, and what separates a manual instrument from an automatic one. Setting Time Is Not Early Strength Initial and final set describe the stiffening of a standardized cement...Read the articleMetal Testing2 Aug 2026Universal Testing Machine Software and What It Has to DoTwo laboratories can test comparable material on similar frames and still report different yield results if they use different control modes, strain inputs or calculation rules. Those differences can originate in the software layer rather than in the frame itself. That is why universal testing machine software deserves the same scrutiny as the force and strain measurement systems. This guide follows the software workflow from method definition and machine control through calculations, reporting and traceability. Control Comes Before Anything Else A tensile test is not simply pulling until something breaks. The standard tells you how fast to pull, and it usually says so in terms of a quantity the crosshead does not measure directly. That leaves the...Read the articleFlexural (Bend) Testing Explained: 3-Point vs 4-Point, Standards, and SetupMetal Testing20 Jul 2026Flexural (Bend) Testing Explained: 3-Point vs 4-Point, Standards, and SetupFlexural (bend) testing explained: what it measures, three-point vs four-point setups, the standards for plastics, metals, composites and concrete, and how to choose the right fixtures and...Read the articleMetal Testing9 May 2026GenTest Software Setup Guide for NextGen NG-EML Universal Testing MachinesGenTest setup affects the full UTM testing workflow: method storage, PC-to-controller communication, user permissions, simulation files, live data acquisition, and report output. This guide follows the GenTest setup video step by step for NextGen NG-EML electromechanical universal testing machines. It covers installation, license activation, workspace configuration, UTM controller connection, safety and peripheral setup, user management, DEMO Mode, simulation files, Control Panel setup, Quick Test, and test method creation. GenTest is the software layer where the test method, machine connection, operator input, live data, calculated results, and report output come together. For operators, service teams, QA/QC labs, and R&D users, the goal is to...Read the articleMetallography Sample Preparation24 Apr 2026Metallography Sample Preparation Equipment: How to Improve Accuracy from Cutting to Final AnalysisAccurate metallographic analysis starts before the specimen reaches the microscope. Cutting, mounting, grinding, and polishing all influence whether the final surface reflects the material’s true structure or carries preparation-related damage. Excess heat, weak edge support, inconsistent pressure, poor abrasive progression, and unstable polishing conditions can all introduce artifacts that affect interpretation. Well-matched metallography sample preparation equipment helps control these risks across the full workflow. By improving sectioning control, mounting stability, and grinding and polishing repeatability, labs can produce more consistent specimens and reduce the chance that preparation defects are mistaken for real material features. Why...Read the articleMetal Testing12 Apr 2026Brinell, Rockwell, Vickers, or Microhardness: Which Test Makes Sense for Your Application?Choosing a hardness test starts with the part itself. Material type, section thickness, geometry, surface condition, inspection purpose, and required testing speed all affect which method will produce a reliable result. Brinell, Rockwell, Vickers, and microhardness methods work differently, so they are not equally suitable for the same component or the same quality task. Brinell, Vickers, and Knoop are based on the size of an indentation, while Rockwell is based on indentation depth. That difference directly affects how the result is obtained and where the method fits best. In production and lab work, problems usually appear when the test method does not fit the application. A part may be too thin for the selected load, the surface may be too rough...Read the article
Related equipment

Machines Behind This Article